A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that become emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble Visible proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman had Earlier been linked to local advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by Paul Feely accountant themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long after the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.