A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national awareness next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their look at, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, where views of the sea are both of those extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one operates have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from quite distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.